Skip Navigation

Europace 2005 7(3):291; doi:10.1016/j.eupc.2005.02.016
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Vitali, L.
Right arrow Articles by Renesto, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Vitali, L.
Right arrow Articles by Renesto, F.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 2005 The European Society of Cardiology. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

CP18: ONE YEAR EXPERIENCE WITH AUTOMATIC AV DELAY OPTIMIZATION BY PEAK ENDOCARDIAL ACCELERATION

L. Vitali, A. Borri Brunetto, L. Gillio Meina and F. Renesto

Sorin Biomedica CRM Saluggia, Italy

BACKGROUND: Optimization of paced AV Delay is important for maximal ventricular performance. Today's practice is based on an echographic procedure, seldom performed due to follow-up time constraints. Optimal AV Delay (OAVD) estimation by Peak Endocardial Acceleration (PEA) may be performed via an automatic AV Delay Scanning followed by a programmer-based analysis of PEA data.

AIM: to retrospectively review effectiveness and ease of use of the OAVD estimation functionality.

METHODS: Data were collected between 12/2003 and 11/2004 on 106 patients implanted with Sorin Biomedica Living System (pts., 62M, age 65.5±9.5y, 25 centres). OAVD estimation was performed at discharge and during follow-up (FU) at 1 month. (7 pts lost at FU). Pacers were programmed in DDD (n=66) and VDD (n=40). On 33 pts the function was executed during an effort test (submaximal 5 min cycling, at or over 110 bpm heart rate). Echo evaluation of OAVD was performed on 62 cases at discharge (30.0%), none at FU.

RESULTS: OAVD was estimated in 223/238 cases (93.7%). Duration of the procedure was 101.7±35.3 s (min 64, max 188). OAVD by PEA was 137.3±31.8 ms in DDD and 122.4±36.2 ms in VDD at discharge. OAVD by echo was 143.3±39.1 ms and 129.1±44.2 ms respectively (p=ns). Correlation between PEA and echo measurements was r=0.92, p>0.001. At FU OAVD by PEA was 143.2±33.4 ms in DDD and 126.7±34.4 ms in VDD. OAVD estimation during effort was possible in 31/33 cases. All of these pts were in VDD mode. OAVD was 104.1±53.2 ms.

CONCLUSION: the function allowed easy and reliable optimization of AVD in a short time. The function may improve patient management and monitoring without extra time and cost to the follow-up. OAVD estimation during effort may be a further addition to standard patient evaluation.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.