Skip Navigation

Europace 2005 7(3):289; doi:10.1016/j.eupc.2005.02.010
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Res, J. C.J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Res, J. C.J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 2005 The European Society of Cardiology. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

CP10: OUTCOME OF RIGHT VENTRCULAR BIFOCAL PACING LEADS: APEX VERSUS OUTFLOW TRACT

Jan C.J. Res1, Marcel Bokern2 on behalf of the BRIGHT-Investigators

1Zaansch MC Zaandam; 2Waterland Hospital Purmerend, Netherlands

BACKGROUND: In 47 pts (40 BRIGHT pts in 9 participating centres) with bifocal pacing in CHF 2 leads are used for RV pacing: apex (Ap) and outflow tract (OT).Pts characteristics: age 69 ± 9 years, 11 female/36 male, NYHA class 3,0 ± 0,3; EF 24 ± 6%; QRS-width178 ± 19 ms.

METHODS: Positioning attempts and complications were noted. Pacing & sensing measurements were done with the Era 300B* at implant or via the pacemaker (STRATOS-LV*): pacing threshold (Thr), R-wave amplitudes (wa) and pacing impedances (Imp), up to 10 months follow up.

RESULTS: For positioning of the Ap and OT lead 1,7 ± 0,8 (1-4) vs. 2,4 ± 2,2(1-10, p<0.05) attempts were needed, with respectively passive fixation vs. active fixation (ELOX*, *=Biotronik). In 2 pts advanced AV block occur—red acutely during active fixation at the RVOT. Conduction recovered < 4 months. Positioning of the Ap lead caused ventricular fibrillation in one pt. Two leads were repositioned due to extreme high Thr's (OT1/Ap1) and two OT leads showed early dislocation and were repositioned successfully. Ap-wa is significant higher vs OT-wa: 22±12 vs.14±9 mV (p<0,001). During follow Ap-wa remained stable (average 19 mV) and OT-wa could not be measured. Thr at Ap was lower 0,5±0,3 Volt vs. OT: 0,7± 0,3 (p<0,0002), which difference remained during follow up, but both showed a significant increase at 1 month: Ap increased to 1,2 ± 0,7 Volt and OT to 1,8 ± 1,1 (both p < 0,0001), and both declined at month 7 to Ap 0,9 ± 0,3 (n= 16, p=0,085) and OT 1,3 ± 0,4 (n=16, p=0,089). Imp was lower at the OT, vs. at the Ap: 627±187 Ohm vs. 981±240 Ohm (p < 0,00001).

CONCLUSION: Significant differences were observed between leads positioned in the OT vs Ap; this partly due to the design of the leads and partly due to the location in the right ventricle. Complications are acceptable, but could be reduced by the growing experience of the investigators.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.